|
|
|
|
Why should Human Evolution be against the Law to teach in public schools? A virgin birth of Adam and Eve is the only possibility for human evolution. 1) Many scientists see evolution as a truth and not an educated conclusion. For many evolution is easily understood, however there is no scientific experiment that demonstrates how chromosomes change in number. Who cares if males and females are different? If the organism is sexual, then it would have to produce both a male and female with the same chromosomal change in order to produce an off spring as a new species. Science has a hard time with making conclusions based on what it can't see. This is why mathematics is such and important tool for us to use when dealing with matter that is not visible to the human eye. If you take half of a substance indefinitely, then one of two outcomes are possible. The Big Bang theory is based on the first outcome that the substance will eventually become so small that it is absurd to think anything exists. The other possible outcome would be that the substance could reach a point where it's mass could not be divided. At this point one and zero are clearly defined. If I cut an apple in half, then it should not be absurd to think that the two parts make the apple a whole. 2) A government can't be founded
on evolution. Evolution is founded on the following three principles:
Mutation, Adaptation, and Natural Selection. Natural Selection concerns
the survival of the strongest with no restrictions to prevent lying, murder,
stealing, or rape. Survival of the fittest makes life in the jungle wild.
In the jungle, is it easy for younger animals to steal food or territory from
older animals? Should it be legal for young adults to steal from older
adults? Our government prevents natural selection by taxing the rich or
strong and giving to the poor or weak. How? Taking from the
rich and giving to the poor thwarts fighting. Also, murder and stealing
are prevented by the government which is in contradiction with the principles of
evolution. Evidence, Hitler tried to establish the perfect human race
under the principles of natural selection. He lied to the Jews by telling
them they were going to take a shower. He took the innocent life or
murdered many Jewish people in gas chambers that looked like showers; he stole
their territory and valuables. According to evolution the poor weak humans
should not be helped, since the weak do not play a role in the survival of the
species. Trying to establish a government on evolution has already been
proven to be a failure. Scientists think in terms of origin and elected
leaders think in terms of Law. Lastly, the very foundation of our legal
system would fall apart based on evolution. Why? 3) The Virgin birth of Jesus (Isaiah 9:6). The virgin birth removes both the woman and the man from conception. If this were not so, then the woman would constantly be having virgin births. A virgin birth of Adam and Eve is the only possibility for human evolution. Jesus had a distinct birth. The birth of Adam and Eve in the Genesis account is distinct. Our legal system is distinct. Jesus claim to be the Messiah and, in fact, to have majesty and authority belonging only to God was therefore regarded by Caiaphas as blasphemy which the Mosaic law prescribed death by stoning (Lev24:16). Coming on the clouds of heaven is what the Jews see as the only way for the Messiah to come and this statement alone infuriated them. The high priest tore his clothes (Mark 14:63). At that point some of the people of Jerusalem began to ask, Isn't this the man they are trying to kill? Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Christ? BUT WE KNOW WHERE THIS MAN IS FROM; WHEN THE CHRIST COMES, NO ONE WILL KNOW WHERE HE IS FROM" (John 7:25-27). The virgin birth of Jesus Christ for the Jewish religion does not validate the Adam and Eve story. So, the Jews must see Jesus coming in a cloud with power and great glory to believe. 4) Jews, Muslims and Christians all believe in the Genesis account of creation. It does not force a religion on people. Also, atheism is a religion in which people choose to believe there is no God in charge. If nothing has power over God, then randomness is infinite and perfection is impossible. The goal of atheism is to convince people that nothing has power over God. It is the opposite of believing in God. Why should I put up with this religion being forced upon me? If we continue educate our children to think that we came from animals, then subconsciously why would they need to obey laws that have no merit. Laws that are made up only to benefit the rich or strong according to natural selection. Moreover, the religion of atheism is to do nothing. Their idea is to promote the doing of nothing. Since they view nothing as perfection. Thus to an atheist Nothing is the perfect God to worship. Moreover, atheists love evolution as it is taught because it has errors associated with it. The corner stone of our government is not evolution. Thus that is at least one error associated with evolution. Atheists only see nothing as perfection. That is why they believe in nothing and not God. Therefore, the doctrine of Atheism indicates that problems always have an ERROR associated with the outcome, since perfection is impossible (Matthew 5:8). 5) Jesus did not come to pressure people into a religion. He came to reconcile with us over the punishment of death. I am not a Buddhist, and I would not like Buddhism forced upon me. I desire to treat my neighbors as I wish to be treated (Joshua 24:15). |
|
Send mail to
steinekerfamily@insightbb.com with
questions or comments about this web site. Established 2001
|
Evolution from insane animals prevents a legal system from establishing justice.
Its all about accountability. The Genesis account of Creation is founded
on this principle. Adam and Eve in this account are created sinless, which
means that they understood the difference between what is good and what is bad.
An insane animal does not know the difference. Adults can't blame apes
which are insane as the reason a crime occurred in court, because they would be
implying equality; since science has proven that some behaviors are
learned and some are inherited. If humans randomly evolved from apes, then
the majority would still have the inherited insanity behavior and establishing a
justice system would be difficult. An adult could easily argue that Homo
homo sapiens have not existed on Earth long enough for these genes to have all
become recessive. Our justice system blatantly affirms the stance that
humans did not come from an insane animal.